Apocalyptic Hope ................ EU Index ........................
globalization
THE TRANSATLANTIC NEW WORLD ORDER (NWO)
ATLANTIC
ALLIANCE ...Western Alliance

Notice the third flag
EU
= makes
the rules ( "rights"
)
US = the might
( the
technology and NATO ) behind those global rules of the EU
PM
Gordon Brown and Bush -- July 29, 2007
Britain and US to have stronger ties
"We know that we cannot solve any of the
world's major problems without the active
engagement of the U.S.," Brown said ahead of the
trip.
And just as Britain and America have always stood
side by side in tackling the great global challenges of the past,
so we will continue to work very closely together as friends to tackle the great global challenges
of the future."
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20070729/brown_visits_070729/20070729?hub=World
Transatlantic Economic partnership -- March 22, 2007;
easier Repatriation; Relocation [ Airbus 380 ]
"for many will travel to and
fro " Daniel 12:
"The European Union and the US will next month start
an ambitious initiative to harmonise regulations, norms and
technical standards in up to 40 economic and industrial sectors,
laying the cornerstone for a single
market between the two regions. ( Ed: will need a single currency )
The pledge is the central item in the draft agenda of the April 30 EU-US summit in Washington, a
senior German government official told the Financial Times
..... "hopeful that they can sign a long-delayed
open sky agreement, which would create a
unified civil aviation market
between the two regions.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/3c67606e-d64d-11db-99b7-000b5df10621,dwp_uuid=70662e7c-3027-11da-ba9f-00000e2511c8.html
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17694862/
http://www.washtimes.com/op-ed/20070319-092046-5159r.htm
http://www.spiegel.de/international/...462160,00.html
http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,...359793,00.html
British news to take on America -- June 2, 2006
Ed:
having watched the pbs version, I have noticed it has a
pro-Palestinian and anti-Israel bias
( just like the U.N. )
This invasion is of the journalistic kind
as the British news media enter the American market or seek to
raise their profile. The most recent example is the BBC World
division of the BBC, which was to start a campaign on Thursday to
introduce Americans to a 24-hour news network on cable television
to compete against CNN and Fox News Channel
And The Times of London, owned by News
Corp., announced last week that it would begin publishing a daily
newspaper for American readers, starting Tuesday, with an initial
print run of close to 10,000 copies to be distributed in New York
and Washington
The campaign for BBC World News is
intended to be thought-provoking. For instance, there are several
posters that at first glance seem to display world maps. On
closer inspection, the countries form provocative images like a
captive kneeling before a soldier or a health worker carrying
dead birds. A billboard in New York will ask passers-by to
look at news photographs and decide which of two sharply
different opinions they agree with. They can vote by sending text
messages on their cellphones and the results will be tallied on
digital displays on the billboard
http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/06/01/business/adco.php
Bush and EU leaders together -- June 20, 2005
"I understand those of us who espouse freedom
have an obligation and those who espouse
human rights have an obligation to live up
to those words," Bush said.
The EU and United States are working on a number of other fronts.
NATO and EU forces
are trying to help maintain some semblance of order in the Darfur
region of Sudan, where Arab Muslims in control of the government
are flushing out poor black majorities from their homes.
"We will act together decisively to
enhance our economic
integration,
http://www.foxnews.com/printer_friendly_story/0,3566,160122,00.html
W
follows EU -- March 1, 2005 ( now looking for
diplomatic solutions)
It would mean a significant
shift in strategy for Bush
After listening to European leaders last week,
Bush agreed to give their ideas careful consideration, and met
with top foreign policy advisers about it on Friday.
France, Germany and UK (old Europe ) speak for the EU
France, Germany and Britain, acting on behalf of
the European Union, have been trying to persuade Iran to give up
its nuclear program in return for trade and other benefits.
Editor: All's fair in war and trade ( ecommerce)
(we may be enemies, but we have an enemy in common which unites
us all; that same enemy will be excluded from ecommerce )
http://www.iht.com/bin/print_ipub.php?file=/articles/2005/02/28/news/vienna.html
http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/02/28/news/vienna.html
EADS -
Airbus set to win Pentagon contract -- Dec.17, 2004
European Aeronautic Defense & Space,
or EADS, whose largest holding is Airbus, now has a fighting
chance to win at least some portion of a multibillion-dollar
Pentagon contract for 100 new midair refueling tanker planes
The Pentagon is walking a financial tightrope,
and the air force seems far more interested in three new
generations of
fighter jets - the F-18, the F-22 and the future F-35
- than in a new tanker to replace the current fleet, which
averages 44 years old.
But EADS North America
has made it clear that it wants to get into the American military
market for the long term, especially as military spending in
Europe trails off. "If there's a competition, we'll be
there," said an EADS spokesman, Guy Hicks.
Airbus this year delivered its 1,000th commercial aircraft to a
U.S. carrier; worldwide, Airbus sales are slightly ahead of
Boeing sales
EADS is not being timid in the tanker battle - it has already
spent more than $100 million in a sales campaign that emphasizes the
American-ness of its U.S.-based operations. But the
aerospace giant also recognizes its disadvantage as a
French bidder.
The Airbus president, Noël Forgeard, told reporters last month
that allowing EADS to compete in the U.S. market would open new
facilities in the United States and give employment to Americans.
EADS is honing its approach with a triple strategy. First, it
wants to make the bid as safely American as possible to calm any fears that a "foreign" company
might attempt to influence U.S. policy in any way during a crisis.
http://www.iht.com/bin/print_ipub.php?file=/articles/2004/12/14/business/air.html
EU 's new image: rule-maker... combined with the US military
might
Arbitrary global rules = "fair play" ? --- Dec. 7, 2004
Justifying the use of Force
a world of fair play, the flip side of
rule-making is compliance, and compliance may require enforcement,
through economic sanctions and other non-military
measures. As a last resort, the EU must even be prepared
to rise to the military defense of the values and
principles it believes are worth protecting. If
Europe is not prepared to take up arms
when it must, then its appeals for fair play will sound to the
rest of the world like mere posturing.
But if fair play is to be made global, European initiatives
should be part of broader international efforts,
involving both like-minded partners such as the United
States and multilateral institutions. A divisive
transatlantic rivalry offers no ethical or political basis for an
enlightened European approach. On the contrary, fair
play requires American power to back it up.
http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/edit/archives/2004/12/06/2003214003
Declaration: "Renewing the Transatlantic Relationship"
American Presidents to be included within Councils... May 16,
2003
US representatives should have the opportunity to observe
proceedings and debates in the European Convention and members
of the American executive branch ought to be
associated with the work of separate European Councils.
These are some of the wide-ranging ideas presented in a joint
declaration by a group of prominent American politicians and
former ministers. The group includes former US Secretary of State
Madeleine K. Albright, Zbigniew Brzezinski, former National
Security Advisor to the President of the United States and
Alexander M. Haig, former Supreme Allied Commander of Europe.
[ note:LEGISLATIVE
BRANCH TOO ]
Both houses in the US Congress should increase their
contacts with the European Parliament and more
direct consultations between the US and the European
Institutional bodies should be established over the next five
years.
The 18 endorsers :
The Declaration was endorsed by Madeleine K. Albright, Harold
Brown, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Frank C. Carlucci, Warren
Christopher, William S. Cohen, Robert Dole, Lawrence S.
Eagleburger, Stuart E. Eizenstat, Alexander M. Haig Jr., Lee H.
Hamilton, John J. Hamre, Carla A. Hills, Sam Nunn, Paul H.
O'Neill, Charles S. Robb, William V. Roth Jr., and James R.
Schlesinger.
http://www.euobserver.com/index.phtml?aid=11257
Center
for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS)... forging the
Atlantic Alliance
http://csis.org/europe/
US and European partnership -- April 28, 2003
Blair also said it was vital for discussions to
begin between Europe and the United States to prevent a dangerous
scenario of two centers of power developing in the world.
"I think it is perfectly possible for Europe to become more
powerful, but as an ally and partner of the United States of
America," Blair said.
French President Jacques Chirac, whose ties with Blair have
been strained by France's opposition to the war, has outlined a
vision of a multipolar world, where a strong European Union would
act as a counterweight to U.S. foreign policy.
"If we don't deal with the world on the basis of a
partnership between Europe and America, then we will, in a sense,
put back into the world the divisions we wanted to get rid of
when the Cold War finished," Blair said. "That would be
just a disaster for the world
http://www.bayarea.com/mld/mercurynews/news/special_packages/iraq/5734484.htm
Source
: "Blair: No doubt Saddam had banned weapons"
US - EU : One Polar Power -- April 28, 2003
"Some want a so-called multi-polar world
where you have different centres of power, and I believe that
that will very quickly develop into rival centres of power. And
others believe, and this is my [ T.
Blair] notion of this, that we need one
polar power but which encompasses a strategic partnership between
Europe and America and other countries too - Russia,
China - where we are trying to ensure that we develop as I say a
common global agenda. Because I think the danger of rival poles
of power is that you end up reawakening some of the problems that
we had in the old cold war with countries playing different
centres of power off against each other, with countries who
really should be together falling out over issues, and that
destabilises the world.
Well that is the argument, but I don't think that
is true. You see this is where I take a different view. My view,
I want a stronger Europe, more capable of speaking with a
unified voice, but I don't want that Europe setting
itself up in opposition to America, because I think that won't
work, I think it will be dangerous and destabilising. And the
truth is America needs to reach out, and I think is reaching out.
And for example in what America is doing in relation to the
Middle East peace process at the moment, so I think taking
account of the fact that there are views out there that believe
this is a major question for the rest of the world that we need
to address. And Europe needs to recognise that America,
particularly post-11 September, has a fixed determination to deal
with its security threat, which I happen also to believe is a
threat to the rest of the world too.
http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=FT.com/StoryFT/FullStory&c=StoryFT&cid=1051389536689
One Polar Power
Europe
and the United States should work as "one polar power"
to tackle the world's problems rather than bickering as
they did over Iraq, British Prime Minister Tony Blair has said.
Speaking to the a British newspaper, Blair said the best way to
stop Washington acting unilaterally was to join forces with it
rather than opposing it.
http://www.hipakistan.com/en/detail.php?newsId=en23848&F_catID=&f_type=source
CFR appoint Kissinger, Summers to bridge US and EU -- April 15, 2003
The task force will bring together leaders from
business, former senior government officials and policy experts
to issue a report that will address the rift. The group will also
include a number of European experts.
http://www.euobserver.com/index.phtml?aid=10936
Time
for closer Transatlantic Cooperation --Feb 6, 2003
However today's political situation creates even
more compelling reasons for transatlantic cooperation and not
only in the security field but also in
economical, environmental and other global issues.
Largest trading partners in the world and largest investors
Today Europe and the United States are the largest
trading partners in the world and the largest investors
into each other's economies.
....a North-Atlantic Trade Area (NATA),
where the EU, NAFTA and EFTA countries should find a free trade
agreement and should afterwards work together in many
other fields on the basis of intergovernmental cooperation,
multilateral systems and mutual respect for creating a North-Atlantic
Security and Economic Area (NASEA).
British-American cooperation should become the
driving force for North-Atlantic Economic cooperation, as
Franco-German reconciliation played a crucial role for European
integration.
http://www.euobserver.com/index.phtml?aid=9263
US wants to become a global peacekeeping force --June 28, 2003
Would NATO morph into IPF ?
The
US defence secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, is discussing the idea of
an international peacekeeping force
which could be dispatched to maintain order in the world's
trouble spots.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,986881,00.html
EU might have the money, but US has
the military power--Feb. 1, 2003
(Ed.
note: If our forces become diminished over the next wars, there
is NATO )
Thursday in Europe there was a dramatic
development in the transatlantic relations --- greatly helping
President Bush on Iraq and potentially transforming the Atlantic
alliance into a stable dominant world
power under American leadership....
For the first time in EU politics, however, the
Franco-German steamroller has been seriously challenged and
perhaps halted. Thursday morning eight European leaders -- the
heads of government of Britain, Italy, Spain, Denmark, Poland,
Hungary, Portugal and the Czech Republic -- issued a statement of
support for the United States over Iraq and, more broadly, for
the role of America as the leading power in the
Atlantic alliance. The next few months are likely to
see a long-drawn-out battle between these two alliances for
control of the expanding EU. And the victory of the
Franco-Germany entity cannot be ruled out -- if only because it
will have the support of the Brussels bureaucracy, the European
social democratic Left, and those nations such as Sweden that
want the EU to be a "counterweight" to American power
in world politics.
[hypothetical
sentence: "I will therefore be
announcing a major U.S. drive for a Transatlantic Free Trade Area
(TAFTA) after Baghdad is liberated. It will include NAFTA, the
EU, any European country that wants to join, and of course
Turkey. And it will create a Euro-American free trade community
to match the Euro-American defense community of NATO.]
http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20030131-125305-5041r
England under the U.S. ?? ( yes, militarily and in Intelligence)
-- July
24, 2003
http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,999605,00.html
Why Bush is Sunk Without Europe--Jan 26, 2003
We need their money
"Its [US ] industrial base is so
uncompetitive that it consistently imports more than it exports;
its current-account deficit, the gap between all its current
foreign earnings and foreign spending, is now a stunning 5 per
cent of GDP, continuing a trend that has lasted for more than 25
years and which is the cause of all that foreign debt. As a
national community, it has virtually ceased to save so that
government and individuals alike live on credit.
To finance the current-account deficit, a reflection
of the lack of saving, the US relies on foreigners supplying it
with the foreign currency it can't earn itself. The
Old Europe that Donald Rumsfeld mocked last week has been helping
to prop up the US economy, buying shares and bonds on
Wall Street, taking over American companies and investing in real
estate, compensating for the saving that the
Americans aren't doing themselves. http://www.observer.co.uk/worldview/story/0,11581,882490,00.html
Brussels European Summit
Conclusions; March 21, 2003
Europe to be the economic
engine of the world
the Lisbon Strategy to make the
European economy the most competitive and dynamic knowledge based
economy in the world, capable of sustainable economic growth with
more and better jobs and greater social cohesion.
http://www.eu2003.gr/en/articles/2003/3/21/2316/
Partnership:
http://www.eurunion.org/partner/home.htm
EU
-US discuss transatlantic aviation and also a "hydrogen
economy" --June 23, 2003
http://www.euobserver.com/index.phtml?aid=11835
What
is a "hydrogen economy" ? (no fossil-fuels)
http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=15239
"Order
out of Chaos" (Illuminati mantra) "
"and
saw a beast rise up out of the sea" (sea-change in world
events) Revelation 13:1
In order for this arrangement to take place, there must be a
crisis, a global war and / or economic collapse
Then the anti-Messiah can arise as Save-r of the world.
Rev. 13 :1 says "And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and
saw a beast rise up out of the sea (of chaos), having seven heads
and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns and upon his heads
the name of blasphemy"
(
power over the G-7 and the EU )
It tells us in Rev. 17 that the 10 kings ( EU ) receive no
kingdom as yet, but share one hour
with the Beast (antichrist). We take that to mean that the
EU--who wants very much to be a Federalized State---will not
arrive at their goal, even by the end of the Great Tribulation.
They will remain nation states subject to the "One
Voice" throughout the Great Tribulation. The most that the
EU will obtain of global governance is one hour with the
beast.....a shared power. This one hour is a literal daily one
hour. It will be the daily pronouncements that are given over the
Televised (TV) broadcast of Atlantic Alliance News)
ONE
HOUR with the Beast
The "one hour" with the beast is fully explained in
"Global Governance"
www.cybertime.net/~ajgood/ch2p3.html
The "one hour"referred to here is most likely a
trans-atlantic news broadcast whereby the AC
will be giving forth his daily pronouncements, and the False
Prophet ( FP..another prominent American, we feel ) will endorse
them globally by providing the consequences
for non-compliance. The AC will be
broadcasting from Europe, and the FP will most likely be here in
America,
making sure the "global village"
marches in lock-step with the daily enforcements.
Personal
note:
Each
evening after watching the American news on ABC, NBC, and CBS,
our household must watch the BBC news on public television in
order to complete the world view on daily news.. So already our
TV news time is ONE HOUR.
These bradcasts are complete with large background screens that
fulfill the line in Scripture that says that the false Prophet
gave "life" to the Beast .... live remote TV. We are so
HERE and NOW.
Class is now in session
Also, as energy-regulations are pronounced nightly on the news,
"class" is in order and at attention, as we receive our
new directives for compliance, or else.
Many other directives are coming out daily, as laws and customs
are vastly changing. Constant change produces
confusion and heightens fears. The Powers that
Be (PTB) profit greatly by our confusion and fears. This enhances
their CONTROL over the masses all the more.
FEARS bring up False Messiahs.
Our living rooms have now become classrooms with an aura of
required attendance. Our media is in league already with the New
World Order. Have you noticed how the American
world-news is spliced to have segments pertaining to each section
of America (Eastern, Central, Mountain and Pacific zones?) For
instance, California sees her storm-watch reported while the East
Coast gets their main story reported. We all do not get the same
half-hour of news. Listen to the audio-mix. Check the US- TV news
with the news reported on the message boards. We are being
segmented here in America, while Europe is uniting.
Does
Europe Need America ?
http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/talking_point/debates/european/newsid_779000/779830.stm
The Many, Controlled by
the Few....the Illuminati
http://www.rense.com/general30/illuminatidefector.htm
Transatlantic
Partnership through NATO
Alliance
calling "premptive strike" ........"preventive
war"
America may be the indispensable nation,
but its partners in Europe are its indispensable allies," it
said. "Virtually every objective that Americans and
Europeans seek will be easier to attain if they work
together."
Charles A. Kupchan, director of Europe studies at
the Council, an 83-year-old nonpartisan private center for
scholars, was the project manager. The co-chairs were former
Secretary of State Henry A. Kissinger and former Secretary of the
Treasury Lawrence H. Summers, now president of Harvard
University.
http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/world/wire/sns-ap-us-allies,0,193733,print.story?coll=sns-ap-world-headlines
French : world a more dangerous place--March 17. 2004
We have to look reality in the face: we have
entered into a more dangerous and unstable world,
which requires the mobilization of the entire
international community," de Villepin said.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,114649,00.html
France proposes Transatlantic Charter -- August 29, 2003
http://www.euobserver.com/index.phtml?aid=12477
"but
the lead role has to be played by the United States.
We are the ones who are there now. We are the ones who took over
the country, we have governing responsibility."
To suggest that "suddenly you could bring in the UN and say,
'It's all yours,'" he said, was "not appropriate."
http://www.iht.com/articles/109158.html
France proposes Transatlantic Charter -- August 29, 2003
http://www.euobserver.com/index.phtml?aid=12477
Will the
Antichrist have the lead role over NATO
forces ?
Will the False Prophet have the lead role over the UN
multinational forces ?
Then, together they will control the armies of the world.
Who can make war with the Beast ? Rev. 13:4
EU and US must align militarily -- Sept. 3, 2003
The second challenge is even more crucial. It is
in the greater Middle East, which stretches from Northern Africa
to Afghanistan. This is the region from which the greatest
threats to the United States and Europe are likely to emanate for
years, if not decades, to come. To meet this challenge, the
trans-Atlantic partners need more than a military campaign plan
to attack terrorists and rogue states. They need to change the
dynamics that created such monstrous groups and regimes in the
first place. Thus, they need a new grand strategy to help
transform the region into a set of societies that can live in
peace with one another and who no longer produce ideologies and
people who want to destroy the West and increasingly have the
ability to do so.
What would the building blocks of such a policy look like? We
need a common effort to win the peace in Iraq. This must be
followed by a renewed effort to reach an Israeli-Palestinian
peace accord. The West needs to encourage positive change,
preferably by peaceful means, in Iran. We must also revamp our
relations with those countries officially allies but ruled by
regimes that at times are part of the problem - Egypt and Saudi
Arabia. And we need to succeed in Afghanistan as well as start to
create a new regional security regime that, over time, helps lock
in progress and creates the foundation for lasting peace.
http://www.iht.com/articles/108567.html
Aug. 29 -- Rome Summit on Defense
According to The Times, "Food for
Thought" puts forward the idea of a "planning
unit" for the EU's ESDP operations to be created as part of
NATO headquarters (SHAPE).
http://www.euobserver.com/index.phtml?aid=12469
NATO
to take over in Iraq ? July 9, 2003
WASHINGTON -- With American costs and
casualties mounting in Iraq, the Bush administration is showing
new interest in putting NATO in charge of the military occupation
as a way of scaling back the U.S. troop commitment, U.S. and NATO
officials say.
Such a change would discomfit some administration hard-liners, as
it would force the United States to share decision-making
on Iraq with European leaders who
opposed the U.S.-led invasion, analysts said. It might also
require seeking a mandate from the United Nations Security
Council, which the United States failed to get before launching
the war to topple Saddam Hussein.
But as the single most powerful nation in NATO, the
United States would retain military command while
spreading the burden and costs among a number of nations, thereby
easing demands on overstretched American forces, diplomats said.
http://www.sunspot.net/news/nationworld/bal-te.troops09jul09,0,1350096.story?coll=bal-news-nation
Bush
touts U.S. role in shaping the world--July
5, 2003
WASHINGTON (AP) - Those serving in the U.S. military and
their families sacrifice a great deal to help their country, but
millions of people around the world depend on the efforts of
American forces, President Bush says.
``Without America's active involvement in the world, the
ambitions of tyrants would go unopposed and millions would live
at the mercy of terrorists,'' Bush said in his weekly radio
address Saturday. He said because of U.S. policies around the
world ``tyrants have learned to fear, and terrorists are on the
run.'' http://www.guardian.co.uk/uslatest/story/0,1282,-2872565,00.html
Bush
: We need trans-Atlantic Alliance --June 1-2003
President Bush should be seeking to mend these
alliances. In his speech yesterday in Poland, he was right to
appeal to the European public more broadly, by reiterating the
importance of a trans-Atlantic partnership forged by common
values. In a recent interview with Le Figaro, Mr. Bush also
adopted a less bullying tone, which we hope he maintains so that
democratic leaders can side more easily with Washington the next
time a divisive issue arises.
It is fine for the Bush administration to champion friends
like Poland and Spain, but America still needs to marshal the
world's leading economic powers to work in concert in addressing
a daunting array of global challenges. These include terrorism,
the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and the
scourges of AIDS, genocidal conflict and hunger afflicting
Africa.http://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/01/opinion/01SUN1.html?ex=1055044800&en=78633a677671823e&ei=5062&partner=GOOGLE
http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20030531-074207-6458r
Atlantic Alliance to share passenger data -- September 24, 2003
Speaking to journalists in Brussels yesterday (23
September), the
US Homeland Security undersecretary, Asa Hutchinson
acknowledged that European concerns on the transfer of sensitive
passenger data, from airlines to the US authorities were
"legitimately expressed".
http://www.euobserver.com/index.phtml?aid=12800
Bush to Europe : Let us unite against terrorism--June 1-2003
http://www.dw-world.de/english/0,3367,4789_W_882818,00.html
Bush
to Europe: "This is a time for us to unite in
defence of liberty" June 1- 2003
"This is a time for all of us to
unite in the defence of liberty and to step up to the
shared duties of free nations," Mr Bush said, adding
emphatically: "This is no time to stir up divisions in a great alliance."
http://www.dailytelegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/06/01/wbush01.xml&sSheet=/news/2003/06/01/ixnewstop.html
NATO
wants more military might from "the ALLIANCE"---June
12-2002
BRUSSELS (Reuters) - NATO Secretary
General George Robertson urged defense ministers on
Thursday to spend more on their military forces to ensure the
alliance remains relevant for new security threats in a
post-September 11 world.
The ministers were expected to start work on an overhaul
of the alliance's military capability and cumbersome
Cold War command structure, preparing it for rapid-reaction
missions in far-flung countries beyond its Euro-Atlantic borders
where dangers from terrorism to weapons of mass destruction may
lurk.
But Bush stressed the importance of the alliance during his
speech to the German Bundestag last month, and Rumsfeld was
expected to call on his European colleagues in Brussels to spend
more -- and spend more wisely -- on defense to preserve it.
[Ed. note: why EU and US will merge ]
European forces lack strategic airlift,
precision-guided weapons and other key capabilities, including
surveillance, air-to-air refueling and tactical missile defense
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=586&ncid=586&e=4&u=/nm/20020606/wl_nm/nato_dc_4
War
on Terrorism forges "The Alliance" between EU and
US....Sept. 27-2001
http://www.newsmax.com/showinsidecover.shtml?a=2001/9/26/223629
W.
Bush :"Europe and America. one voice and only one
voice" -- June 15, 2001
He said:
"Europe and the United States need to speak with one voice,
and only one voice."
" I believe the stronger Europe is, the better it is for
America."
He said: "Europe and the United States
need to speak with one voice, and only one voice."
Asked if America felt threatened by the EU's officially stated
ambition of displacing the country as the world's leading economy
by 2010, he gave what seemed to be a wry smile.
"I appreciate good competition. I believe competition brings
out the best in nations, and in people. I don't view the European
Union and its consolidation as a zero-sum game for the United
States.
I believe the stronger Europe is, the better it is for
America."
.........
But with a speed that has caught Washington off guard, the
EU has become unrecognisable. It sports a new currency that is
openly intended to knock the US dollar off its perch, and
it has acquired the diplomatic apparatus of an activist power
under the terms of the Maastricht and Amsterdam treaties - even
if the mechanisms are not yet working properly.
The EU's new foreign and security machinery is
already cutting its teeth in the Balkans, which is becoming a
sort of loose EU protectorate, while the EU's enlargement process
is turning most of Central and Eastern Europe into an outer tier
of the union."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2001/06/15/wbush115.xml
Bush
talks of unity
"We share more
than an alliance; we share a civilization," Bush said of U.S. ties to Europe.
"Its values are universal, and they share a ... partnership in a unique way."
The Polish leg of the
trip -- Bush's first to Europe -- offered the president the
chance to reiterate his administration's support for a strong and
united Europe, including Russia,
that
will work closely with the United States.
http://www.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/europe/06/15/bush.trip03/index.html
Atlantic
Partnership
http://www.dailytelegraph.co.uk/dt?ac=005624373810512&rtmo=qKpRLxK9&atmo=rrrrrrrq&pg=/01/7/26/do01.html
W.
Bush on the Transatlantic Relationship
he was dedicated to
maintaining transatlantic ties. In his
He said: "This is
a president who values the common heritage and the values that
unite us....
I believe this is an
incredibly important relationship and I'll work hard to nurture
it."....
"The Europeans
are going to find they've got a trustworthy friend in the Bush
administration: one that will stay steady and true, one whose
position isn't going to shift because of focus groups suggesting
we may need to shift positions.
"And to me that is the best kind of friend to have: somebody
who commits to a friendship and somebody who is steady in their
opinions and strong in their beliefs andpredictable."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/et?ac=001669821461706&rtmo=wKt5s5Kb&atmo=99999999&pg=/et/01/6/12/
wbush12.html
"the
kingdom shall be divided"...Daniel 2:41
America
engaged with Europe
he [W. Bush] wanted to
see a "strong" EU and his trip to Gothenburg was
intended to send a "loud signal" that under his
leadership America would remain engaged with Europe....
[Tony Blair] : ' there was "far more that unites
America and Europe than divides us in terms of shared values,
a belief in democracy, the rule of law and justice".
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/et?ac=001669821461706&rtmo=QeSk9eOR&atmo=99999999&pg=/et/01/6/15/wbush15.html
Europe
shows political solidarity with US....Sept. 19-2001
http://www.euobserver.com/index.phtml?selected_topic=9&action=view&article_id=3490
European
future lies with the US ??
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/talking_point/debates/european/newsid_1180000/1180003.stm
NATO
opens all airfields and ports to US military
(Article#5)....Oct.5-2001
http://www.startribune.com/stories/1576/735891.html
Transatlantic
FreeTrade Zone....U.S. and Britain ?...July 26-2001 ...TAFTA
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/0,,2-2001254700,00.html
Euro-Atlantic
Partnership Council.....NATO to weld 44 nations of Europe
together
(America, Europe East and West, ........and Russia)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/et?ac=001669821461706&rtmo=wKt5QjMb&atmo=99999999&pg=/et/97/7/10/
wnat10.html
June15-2001 ...W. Bush...enlarged NATO..."a house of many
mansions"
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/et?ac=005279571853519&rtmo=QeSkw0pR&atmo=rrrrrrrq&pg=/et/01/6/16
/wbush216.html
NATO receives
orders from the White House ....Sept. 28-2001
Getting
close to worshipping the State
Pledge to become law ?
http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A42664-2001Jan24.html
"calling
fire down from heaven"
American
Technology...NMD...Nuclear Missile Defence
http://www.guardianunlimited.co.uk/bush/story/0,7369,421344,00.html
Articles :
EU Observer:
" Salt & Pepper" (debate) columns http://www.euobserver.com/index.phtml?sid=7
Galileo
and GPS to work together --- June 23, 2004
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/06/22/galileo_accord/
http://www.euobserver.com/?sid=9&aid=16704
Galileo and Beidou
cooperate
CENC - China-Europe global navigational satellite system centre -
Sept. 18, 2003
http://www.esa.int/export/esaNA/SEM5180P4HD_index_0.html
EU Ambassador to the US -- May 12, 2004
Transatlantic Week organized by TIESWeb in Miami.
In both cases, a clear message came out: Europeans are not doing
enough to communicate in the US what the European Union is
becoming and they are not doing it effectively.
At the GlobalEurope seminar of future EU/US relations
in The Hague as well as in Miami with community
leaders from across the EU and the USA :
And among many other elements discussed on these
two occasions, another point was raised - the fact that in the
USA the European Union should have a politician rather
than another eurocrat to be its voice and face in media,
talk-shows and conferences.
efficiency will depend on the ability of the EU Ambassador to
Washington to reach out to civil society and be an
attractive interlocutor for European civil society groups willing
to engage in dialog with their US counterparts as well.
http://euobserver.com/?aid=15610&rk=1
Transatlantic Week ( last week of April 2004) in Miami
http://www.tiesweb.org/transatlantic_week/index.htm
Global Europe 2020 http://www.europe2020.org/en/anticipation/global/GlobalEurope2.htm
Fischer wants a strong trans-Atlantic partnership
(Joschka) Fischer,
in addition to his remark on rejecting a Europe that is a rival
to the United States, talked of a trans-Atlantic
partnership after the Iraq war in which we
must bring all our capabilities together to win the
peace.
(Tony) Blair, warning France against a plan he
said would make for rivalries and instability, urged Europe
and the United States to work as a one-polar
world in tackling problems.
"a single power ruling over the affairs of the planet"
Four Europe
France, Germany, Belgium and Luxembourg
announced they would set up their own military operations
center next year.
http://www.iht.com/articles/103049.html
Tony Blair to American
Congress : Don't give up on Europe --July 17, 2003
"If Europe and America
are together, the
others (globalism: the rest of
the world) will work with us.
If we split, the rest will play around, play us off and nothing
but mischief will be the result of it."
http://www.euobserver.com/index.phtml?aid=12169
EU - US should "marry" power and law -- July 10, 2003
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,995146,00.html
EU
weighs more activist foreign policy -- June 20, 2003
"there are numerous references to the need
for watertight trans-Atlantic cooperation.
The documents says
"no other country or group of countries comes
close" to the military might of the United States.
The trans-Atlantic relationship is described as one of
the "core elements" of the international system and as
indeed "irreplaceable."
Yet implicit in the document is that Europe will forge its own
foreign policy that may differ from the goals of the United
States.
http://www.iht.com/articles/100207.html
American finger in pie wanted ---
April 26, 2003
Finally, the USA plays an important role in European foreign
policy schemes. Rather than only being a transatlantic villain
that splits the old continent in a game of "divide et
impera", member states are glad to have the American finger
in the pudding. The US offers protection
against the potential threat from the East and balances the
ambitions of the big member states in their midst, particularly
France and the UK.
http://www.euobserver.com/index.phtml?aid=11011
France and
UK call for new force at top of EU...May 17-2002
Britain on Wednesday joined forces with France to
demand the creation of a powerful new president
of the European Council who, Tony Blair, UK prime minister,
believes will become the public face and driving force of
Europe.
The aim is to give Europe a high-profile political leader, who would also serve as the EU's face in international affairs and take a key role in developing defence and foreign policies. Mr Blair thinks the new president would give the EU a sharper identity, providing much-needed leadership and accountability.
Peter Hain, Europe minister, told the FT on
Wednesday that the council president would
"probably be a former head of
government". [ See Rev. 17:11 ]
http://news.ft.com/ft/gx.cgi/ftc?pagename=View&c=Article&cid=FT3ZO2DM91D&live=true&tagid=ZZZPB7GUA0C&subheading=UK
EU want a common foreign and
security policy -- March 21, 2003
EPP... European People's
Party ( Wilfried Martens)
"moral obligation to show solidarity"
http://www.euobserver.com/index.phtml?aid=10637
Powerful EU leader from former presidents
or PMs---Oct 28, 2002
Mr Giscard's blueprint will suggest that the EU has one unified
treaty and gain a "single legal personality"
allowing the EU to sign treaties and sit on international bodies
such as the United Nations. The current complex structure that
divides policy areas into separate "pillars" will be
axed.
The document will accommodate the possibility of a new president
of the European Council, opening the way for Tony Blair's
preference, a powerful leader drawn
from the ranks for former prime ministers or presidents.
The selected person might be approved by a new congress that
would meet periodically to take big decisions.
It may also open the way for the EU to be renamed Mr
Giscard has already voiced a preference for "United
Europe", and a slogan to stress Europe's main
objectives, such as "justice, solidarity and
liberty".
Mr Giscard's document follows the Brussels EU summit last week,
which brought strong signs of a Franco- German rapprochement.
http://news.independent.co.uk/europe/story.jsp?story=346565
France and Britain demand
powerful EU president...May 16-2002
http://www.euobserver.com/index.phtml?selected_topic=9&action=view&article_id=6293
Democratization: directly elected EC presidency
http://europe.cnn.com/2000/WORLD/europe/11/14/germany.fischer/index.html
http://www.guardianunlimited.co.uk/eu/story/0,7369,397737,00.html
Jan
9-2001....EU wants permanent leader...not rotational---says Prodi
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/europe/newsid_1108000/1108235.stm
Next on EU agenda : elect EU Leader...April 2001
"What powers
should be vested in an elected commission president? Clearly he
or she would have
unprecedented authority, but that would raise new issues to be
resolved, ranging from accountability and the circumstances in
which the president could be forced from office to questions
about whether the EU executive's officials would by extension
have greater clout."
http://www.iht.com/articles/16666.html
Rise
of antichrist
11th
horn
of Daniel 7:20; and 8th king of Revelation
17:12
Next
step antichrist
solving
the mid-east crisis from Europe.....Hal Lindsey
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=19049
FOREIGN
FORCES PATROLLING USA ?
Strange
Allies: NATO, Atlantic Union, and Economic Socialism
http://www.newsmax.com/commentarchive.shtml?a=2001/10/30/233123
US
Army and Cyberwarfare
"We see three emerging
threats: ballistic missiles, cyberwarfare and space
control," said Lt. Gen. Edward Anderson, deputy
commander in chief at U.S. Space Command, which was recently
assigned the task of creating a cyberattack strategy.
"Cyberwarfare is what we might think of as attacks against
digital ones and zeros."......OPLAN 3600
will
work with CINC (Commanders in Chief) of all military personnel.
and will have
"unprecedented
cooperation with commercial enterprises
and other organizations."
to
include "denial of service"; will work with the FBI (of
carnivore)
http://www.cnn.com/2000/TECH/computing/11/22/cyberwar.machine.idg/index.html
US
Sovereignty or UN Dominance ??
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2000/12/19/181650.shtml
Electronic Warfare....HAARP....Radio station, Tennessee
http://www.ecologynews.com/cuenews31.html
ADRIAN
TAYLOR
http://www.tiesweb.org/congress/opinion/taylor.htm
"Europe
in Bible Prophecy" by Dr. David Reagan of Lamb and
Lion ministries.
http://www.lamblion.com/prophecy/signs/Signs-08.php
CONTINUED: Part 2 .... Extradition of
citizens , Europol, The EU Constitution; Charter of Fundamental
Rights; Human Rights, European Court of Human Rights, etc.
www.cybertime.net/~ajgood/eu.html
LINKS
:
European Governance
Globalization ECB , Cashless
Society
NWO FORCES
World Court
You, Andrew Marvel
Greater Europe
Royal
Houses of Europe http://gsteinbe.intrasun.tcnj.edu/royalty/royalty.html
http://www.royalty.nu/Europe/
http://www.learnenglish.org.uk/links/royalty.html
The
House of Rothschild
David
de Rothschild to head integrated banking system
www.iht.com/articles/102215.html --July 9, 2003
http://www.financeasia.com/articles/FED4BADC-8A08-11D4-8C130008C72B383C.cfm
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/slavery.htm
http://www.ojczyzna.pl/BOOKS/the-money-changers-ch6-9.htm
http://www.rvcm.co.il/rothschilds.php
http://www.redherring.com/mag/issue68/news-print.html