Apocalyptic Hope ....................................... All Chip Implant Articles
HAZARDS of the
Subdermal ID CHIP
" There's no way in the world, having read this
information, that I would have one of those chips implanted in my
skin,
or in one of my family members." -- Dr. Robert Benezra (
Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center NY )
Please see Rev. 16: 2 and 10 .." and there fell a
noisome and grievous sore upon the men which had the mark of the
beast " ..."and they gnawed their tongues for
pain" ( vs 10 ) .
Ed: The
Verichip implant is a glass-implanted silicon chip with a
polypropylene polymer sheath, which is "bio-bonded" to
skin tissue. It has an electromagnetic copper coil antenna 'wound
around a ferrite iron core' and a capacitor.)
Although there is no battery in the subdermal chip, it does have
a capacitor. A capacitor is like a sleeping battery which can
hold the energy transmitted to it by a scanner. It can hold that
power for some length of time.
From the newswires :
Fair educational use
Painful Removal
" In design, the tag is simple: A
medical-grade glass capsule holds a silicon computer chip,
a copper antenna and a "capacitor" that transmits data
stored on the chip when prompted by an electromagnetic reader.
What if you get tired of it ... can it be easily, painlessly
removed ? " ...
(Ed: It is NOT
easily removed; must be removed surgically, at a time when no one
will want a public record of having done so. Think about it.)
"The capsules can migrate around the body or bury themselves
deep in the arm.
When that happens, a sensor X-ray and monitors are needed to
locate the chip,
and a plastic surgeon must cut away scar tissue
that forms around the chip."
The relative permanence is a big reason why Marc Rotenberg, of
the Electronic Privacy Information Center, is suspicious about
the motives of the company, which charges $20 a year for
customers to keep on its database a record of blood type,
allergies, medications, driver's license data and living-will
directives.
For $80 a year, it will keep an individual's
full medical history."
http://www.redding.com/news/2007/jul/22/tiny-microchip-stirs-big-debate-over-human-use/
http://www.ledger-dispatch.com/news/newsview.asp?c=220483
RFI / EMI : too many interfering frequencies in telemetry -- May
22, 2008
Ed: leading to mistakes
Some of this energy is required for data
communications and proper operation of the multitude of devices
used within the facility, and other energies are the result of
manmade interference. Each of these devices emits energies at
various power levels and operates on their assigned frequencies.
In order for all of these devices to operate within the same
environment, it becomes necessary to understand the potential
interference that each device can cause and realize each
device’s susceptibility to interference from the other
devices. This aspect of radio technology is known as Radio
Frequency Interference/Electro-Magnetic Interference (RFI/EMI).
Today Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) can be utilized
for asset inventory, security access, and rapidly tracking
animal census. Animal laboratories have been utilizing RFID for
the identification of animals. Subcutaneous transponders
are used for smaller animals and pets while RFID ear tags,
bracelets, and bolus tags are used for larger animals. Passive
Integrated Transponders (PIT) offering
Electronic Identification (EID) meet international standards
such as ISO 11784 and 11785, which describe the protocols to be
used by the animal identification community. Typically these
devices utilize a low-frequency (LF) air interface having
emissions at 125 kHz to 135 kHz. The limitation of LF technology
is its relatively short range of detection, typically from almost
contact up to as much as a few feet. Another significant
shortcoming of LF is its lack of anti-collision capability,
limiting the reader to detect only one tag at a time
http://www.animallab.com/articles.asp?pid=341
VeriChip :
No where to run; nowhere to hide -- April 15, 2008
http://media.www.signal-online.net/media/storage/paper771/news/2008/04/16/Opinion/john-Doe.Becomes.A.Thing.Of.The.Past-3325756.shtml
Verichip Cancer Link --Jan. 9, 2008
The chips, which are approximately twice the size
of a grain of rice, were approved by the FDA for human
implantation in 2005. But the Associated Press has revealed that
as early as 1996, researchers had uncovered a
link between the devices and cancer. Rodents implanted
with the chips were found to develop malignant tumors beneath the
skin, usually surrounding the devices. The rates were high enough
-- as high as 10 percent of animals implanted,
in a 1998 study -- to raise warning bells with the researchers,
who reported their concern in peer-reviewed journals.
http://www.transworldnews.com/NewsStory.aspx?id=32621&cat=10
RFID Implants Found to Cause Cancer Tumors
http://www.newstarget.com/022467.html
The site also warns consumers about the dangers of
processed foods, pharmaceuticals, chemotherapy, environmental
toxins and the failure of government regulators like the FDA.
www.newstarget.com
CASPIAN report "Unfortunately" http://www.antichips.com/cancer/ describes cancer-link with chip
in detail --
Nov. 20, 2007
http://www.unobserver.com/layout5.php?id=4091&blz=2
Must sign a no-accountability registration before being implanted
; Hazardous to children
What
REALLY happened to Derek Jacobs ? How come no autopsy ?
http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2007/09/16/health/15150770220.txt
Hazards of the Chip -- Oct. 17, 2007
Earlier this month, it was reported that some lab
animals implanted with chips developed cancer
and sarcoma. Other possible adverse effects
include
tissue reactions, migration of the implanted
chip, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) incompatibility,
electrical hazards, infection and even compromised
information security.
http://www.sys-con.com/read/445923.htm
Insurance
Company wants implanted persons to see their doctors -- Sept. 17, 2007
Horizon Blue
Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey said last week that it will
ask patients who were implanted with a groundbreaking microchip
to consult their doctors in response to a report that the device
may cause cancer
http://www.njbiz.com/weekly_article_reg.asp?aID=44345515.835731.934674.2671412.2555643.879&aID2=71889
Are the
chemicals on the coating causing cancer ? How good is "FDA
approved" ? -- September 17, 2007
" To get a
sense of how worrisome this newly uncovered research might be, we
asked one of them. Amal Graafstra has put two chips in his own
hands voluntarily, but he deliberately avoided the kind
approved by the FDA.
The reason is he wanted to be able to remove his implants
easily for any reason.
The "anti-migration" coating on pet and human
implant chips makes them much harder to take out.
Graafstra said he strongly suspects it's this coating that
caused cancerous cells to grow around the implant sites on
the animals in the studies.
"Now I'm just that much more satisfied I chose not to
get an 'FDA-approved human' or pet implant which have this coating,"
he writes in his blog.
Could it be that self-taught "guinea pigs" provide
better expertise than the FDA? "
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2003888000_btdownload17.html
Animal
skin different from human skin [ scroll to "Animal "
]
Cats 2-3 skin cell layers
Dogs 3-5 skin cell layers
Humans 10-15 skin cell layers
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shampoo
Animal
resistance greater than in humans
"If the
dog’s skin is 20-25 times thicker than that of humans,"
http://www.collierescue.org/waterbowl/apr-2006.htm
Dog's skin tissue is tougher than human skin
http://www.health.org.nz/diff.html
VeriChip
causes cancerous tumors ( sarcomas) -- September 8, 2007
Rev.
16: 2 " and there fell a noisome and grievous sore upon the
men who had the mark of the beast "
When VeriChip
is placed just under the surface of the skin ( forehead, right
hand ) then it will be surrounded by very soft tissue and far
more hazardous than it is now, being surrounded by muscle-tissue
in the forearm.
VeriChip linked
to CANCEROUS TUMORS ( Sarcomas )
http://www.starbanner.com/article/20070908/APN/709080608&template=storydetails
http://www.journalgazette.net/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070908/APN/709080608&template=apart
http://blog.wired.com/sterling/2007/09/arphid-watch-ar.html
"There's no way in the world, having read this
information, that I would have one of those chips implanted in my
skin,
or in one of my family members." -- Dr. Robert Benezra (
Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center NY )
Tumor
studies unmentioned
The
fine print on the back of the VeriChip Patient Registration Form
warns customers of potential health risks, but it makes no
reference to research reporting a link between embedded transponders and malignant
tumors in test animals
Among risks that are mentioned:
Access to the company database that stores
patients' medical profiles may
go down, even in emergencies.
And the microchip may
not work in places where there are ambient radio transmissions -
such as inside ambulances or near MRI machines.
VeriChips should not be used, the
registration statement warns, by children, people with blood disorders or
allergies to glass, or pregnant women, among others
Those who are considering a VeriChip implant must first sign a
statement, printed in capital letters, waiving any claims against
the company related to the product's
"merchantability and fitness
What could happen if consumers aren't told of a product's
potential risk?
http://www.starbanner.com/article/20070908/APN/709080608&template=storydetails
http://www.enjoyfrance.com/content/view/1025/31/
Cancerous Tumors
Tumors that arise from
glandular cells are called carcinomas.
Tumors that arise
from the skin, muscle, bone and fibrous connective tissues of the
body are called sarcomas.
When cancers are found in their original location they are called
primary tumors. When they have moved to a new location in the
body they are called metastatic tumors. Only malignant tumors
have the capacity to move to new locations. Because of this and
their invasiveness, they are life threatening. Cancers that move
often become trapped in the sieve-like structure of the lungs,
liver, bone marrow and kidneys. When they do the symptoms that we
see are do to the physical destruction of these organs more than
to the tumor cells themselves. Metastatic tumors are usually
highly vascular. That is, they are rich in blood vesicles to
supply the nutrients that fast-growing tumor cells require
http://www.pets.ca/articles/article-cancer.htm
Stocks fall -- Sept. 11, 2007
It is hoping to turn the
implantable-chip business into a much bigger new line for the
estimated 45 million Americans [ Ed: adults only ] who
make up the potential market.
http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/business/story.html?id=f49067b1-a775-4121-be85-e3686f1217db
VERICHIP LINKED TO CANCER
A
series of veterinary and toxicology studies, dating to the
mid-1990s, stated that chip implants had "induced"
malignant tumors in some lab mice and rats.
"The transponders were the cause of the tumors,"
said Keith Johnson, a retired toxicologic pathologist, explaining
in a phone interview the findings of a 1996 study he led at the
Dow Chemical Co. in Midland, Mich.
Leading cancer
specialists reviewed the research for The Associated Press and,
while cautioning that animal test results do not necessarily
apply to humans, said the findings troubled them. Some said they
would not allow family members to receive implants,
and all urged further research before the glass-encased
transponders are widely implanted in people.
Did the agency know of the tumor findings before approving the
chip implants? The FDA declined repeated AP requests to specify
what studies it reviewed.
The FDA is
overseen by the Department of Health and Human Services, which,
at the time of VeriChip's approval, was headed by
Tommy Thompson. Two weeks after the
device's approval took effect on Jan. 10, 2005, Thompson left his
Cabinet post, and within five months was a board member of
VeriChip Corp. and Applied Digital Solutions. He was compensated
in cash and stock options.
Also making no
mention of the findings on animal tumors was a June report by the
ethics committee of the American Medical Association,
which touted the benefits of implantable RFID devices.
Had committee members reviewed the literature on cancer in
chipped animals?
No, said Dr. Steven Stack, an AMA board
member with knowledge of the committee's review.
Was the AMA aware of the studies?
In 1997, a study in Germany found cancers in 1 percent of 4,279
chipped mice. The tumors "are
clearly due to the implanted microchips," the authors wrote
There's no way in the world, having read this
information, that I would have one of those chips implanted in my
skin, or in one of my family members," said Dr.
Robert Benezra, head of the Cancer Biology Genetics Program at
the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York.
Before microchips
are implanted on a large scale in humans, he said, testing should
be done on larger animals, such as dogs or monkeys. "I mean,
these are bad diseases. They are life-threatening.
And given the preliminary animal data, it looks to me that
there's definitely cause for concern
In humans, sarcomas, which strike
connective tissues, can range from the highly curable to
"tumors that are incredibly aggressive and
can
kill people in three to six months," he said.
When the FDA approved the device, it noted some Verichip risks:
The capsules could migrate around the body, making them difficult
to extract; they might interfere with defibrillators, or be
incompatible with MRI scans, causing burns. While also warning
that the chips could cause "adverse tissue reaction,"
FDA made no reference to malignant growths in animal studies
http://www.journalgazette.net/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070908/APN/709080608&template=apart
VERICHIP : CANCER CHIP
http://blog.wired.com/sterling/2007/09/arphid-watch-ar.html
Subdermal ACTIVE
tags in the future -- June 28, 2007
"Active RFID tags contain an internal battery,
allowing them to store more sophisticated information, process
data, and transmit over longer distances. Currently, only
passive tags are approved for human use, but there's no reason
to think that current limitations will stand indefinitely.
... doctors "cannot assure patients that the
personal information contained on RFID tags will be appropriately
protected
Future tags with more sophisticated capabilities may
have greater potential for abuse, and the report suggests these
are not a matter of if, but when.
..."this shifts the security burden onto whoever
maintains those records. But the field looks poised to
change rapidly, meaning that if it wants to stay on top of
the situation, the AMA will have to act more quickly than the
three-year gap between FDA approval of RFID tags and this report
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070628-ama-says-human-rfid-tags-could-pose-serious-privacy-risk.html
Subdermal Active devices in the future -- June 28, 2007
June 28, 2007 (Computerworld) --" The American Medical Association (AMA) this week issued a report that gave mixed reviews
on the use of implanted radio frequency identification (RFID)
based technology to keep track of medical patients. The report
concluded that while implanting the technology into humans could
improve patient care, it also has yet to be proven safe or
secure.
"These devices may present physical risks to the
patient," the report said. "Though they are removable,
their small size allows them to migrate under the skin, making
them potentially difficult to extract."
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9025888&intsrc=hm_list
Actual report by AMA on Verichip June 2007
http://rinf.com/alt-news/contributions/mick-meaney/rfid-is-not-safe-ama-report/657/
RFID tags -- Dr. Burton Kaliski , jr.
"An RFID tag can’t be read by satellite; it’s not
a homing device. But a network of ubiquitous readers would
have essentially the same effect. If a tag can be read by any
reader, and readers are “everywhere,” then effectively
a tag is readable almost in any public place a person might go."
http://www.infosecwriters.com/hhworld/hh10/rfid.htm
Goal of VeriChip :
Implant ACTIVE rfid devices with batteries ] June 26, 2007
Batteries contain toxic lithium
The Passive chips are already hazardous. Passive
chips are READ ONLY. Active devices are READ-WRITE
enabling data changes on the device.
Speaking of the Verichip: " There are also
health concerns.
While the devices are removable [ Ed: by surgery only ]
and designed to stay in place, their small size could
allow them to move to other parts of a person's body.
[ Ed: Making it more difficult to remove ]
They may also cause interference with electrical devices like
defibrillators and it has not been determined what impact
they would have on prescription drugs.
Ed: Future
"devices"
The
FDA may eventually approve "active" devices which
contain internal batteries and can be updated as a
patient's condition changes. [ Ed: termed
"personal duress' ]
The association warned of "potential social
consequences" such as using the devices for surveillance
which could be an infringement on individual liberties."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070626/hl_afp/ushealthsciencetechnology
Lithium toxicity -- Dr. Dennis Opresko 1995
"The nervous system is the primary target organ
of lithium toxicity. Neurologic effects occurring during
prolonged therapy often include minor effects on memory, motor
activity, and associative productivity (Kocsis et al., 1993).
Movement disorders (myoclonus, choreoathetosis), proximal muscle
weakness, fasciculations, gait disturbances, incontinence,
corticospinal tract signs, and a Parkinsonian syndrome (cogwheel
rigidity, tremor) have been reported (Sansone and Ziegler, 1985).
Cases of severe lithium neurotoxicity, which may occur during
chronic therapy as a result of increased lithium retention, may
be characterized by disorientation, incoherence, paralysis,
stupor, seizure, and coma (Hall et al., 1979).
Permanent brain damage has occurred in several patients on
long-term lithium therapy (Gosselin et al., 1984)."
Little information was found in the available literature
on the carcinogenicity of lithium compounds.
However, three patients on chronic lithium therapy developed
leukemia, and one developed a thyroid tumor.
http://rais.ornl.gov/tox/profiles/lith_c.shtml
http://nelmh.org/page_view.asp?c=20&did=2307&fc=005185004
Bio-BOND
( Ed: can only be surgically removed ) Ed: only the cap is
anti-migratory )
"The patented BioBond anti-migration cap is
a porous polypropylene polymer sheath attached to RFID
microchip implants to impede migration of the device
within animal tissue. The use of the patented BioBond cap results
in increased retention by promoting the development of fibrocytes
and collagen fibers around the implant, thus inhibiting movement
of the implant within the animal." -
http://www.destronfearing.com/elect/elect.html
http://www.politechbot.com/p-02154.htm
Components of the
VeriChip
http://www.rapturechrist.com/666.htm
The second component of the
transponder is a coil of copper wire wound around a ferrite
(iron) core. This functions as a tiny radio antenna to pick
up the signal from the scanner, and to send the encoded ID number
from the microchip back to the scanner. The third component is a
capacitor used for tuning.
The outside of the
transponder is a soda lime glass that has been specially
selected for known biocompatibility. During manufacture, this
glass is hermetically sealed so it is not possible for any
moisture from the host human's body fluids to reach the
electronics inside.
http://community.livejournal.com/verichip/4992.html
Goal of VeriChip
ADS is looking at the
use of a thermocouple and capacitor as the power supply for
implanted equipment (Fig 4).
Electricity generated in the user's body would be stored in
the capacitor for use by the implanted equipment.
Matsuo Kishi, manager, MM Development Department,
Micromechatronics Business Unit, Seiko Instruments Inc of Japan,
which also manufactures thermocouples, explained: "Even
though body temperature is about +36centigrade,
the temperature near the skin is about +33centigrade, providing a
temperature differential of about 3centigrade. Temperature also
varies considerably depending on what part of the body you
measure." In short, implanted power supplies are no longer
mere pipe dreams
http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/NEA/archive/200308/259890/
FDA admits the Negative
side of VeriChip
Letter from the FDA October 12, 2004
...--Oct. 21, 2004.
"The potential risks to health associated with the device
are: adverse tissue reaction, migration of implanted
transponder, . failure of implanted transponder, .
electromagnetic interference, electrical hazards, magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI) incompatibility and needle stick,"
said the letter, which was obtained by Consumers Against
Supermarket Privacy Invasion and Numbering, or CASPIAN.
WorldNetDaily quoted Katherine Albrecht, founder and director of
CASPIAN, chastised Applied Digital and manufacturer Digital Angel
for failing to mention the negative aspects of its technology:
She said a document from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
warns that when under MRI, "Electrical currents may be
induced in conductive metal implants" that can cause
"potentially severe patient burns."
The implant, about the size of a grain of rice, uses radio waves
to transmit medical and financial account
information to reader devices. There is a risk that these
transmission could be intercepted and duplicated by others or
that ' as privacy advocates have warned ' the devices could be
used to track an individual's movements and location
VeriPay implanted patrons can buy drinks and food with a
"wave of their hand."
"The objective of this technology is to bring an ID
system to a global level that will destroy the need to carry
ID documents and credit cards," Chase said.
http://www.investors.com/breakingnews.asp?journalid=23613941&brk=1
Conditional endorsement -- July 10, 2007
in its report, though, the AMA did cite concerns about the
devices impinging on privacy and possible health issues such as interfering
with defibrillators or interacting with prescription drugs.
Some foes of the chip see it as the beginning of the end for
personal privacy, citing Orwellian consequences of hooking
human bodies to computers via subcutaneous information devices.
She said the AMA did not specifically endorse the VeriChip
device, but “we make the only one that is cleared by the
FDA.” [ Ed: the FDA also gave a conditional response ]
There are also health concerns. While the devices are removable
and designed to stay in place, their small size could allow them
to move to other parts of a person's body.
The association also warned of "potential social
consequences" such as using the devices for
surveillance, which could be an infringement on
individual liberties
http://www.bocaratonnews.com/index.php?src=news&refno=20372&category=Main%20Headline
Hazards of the VeriChip -- May 19, 2007
" This whole medical trial … really raises some pretty
important issues about informed consent," said
Katherine Albrecht, the founder of the advocacy group Consumers
Against Supermarket Privacy Invasion and Numbering.
Albrecht is concerned that Alzheimer's patients are being
enrolled in what she considers a potentially risky study
without their consent.
When the FDA approved VeriChip's product, it mentioned
potential problems, including electromagnetic interference,
failure of the chip to function properly and adverse bodily
reactions both physical and psychological --
and let prospective participants know their right to withdraw by
having their chip removed or deactivated. [ Ed: requires surgery
]
The FDA approval letter did not specify the severity or
likelihood of these risks
http://www.abcnews.go.com/Health/ActiveAging/story?id=3186229&page=1
http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=sci_tech&id=5319392
http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/06/27/is-this-what-the-ama-had-in-mind/ [ Ed: extraction almost impossible if
chip migrates ]
POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing
list You may redistribute this message freely if you include this
notice. To subscribe, visit http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com /
Even tho the chip is hazardous to your health, yet it is not covered by insurance -- May 19, 2007
( Ed: that ought to tell you something ..it IS hazardous to your
health )
It is not yet covered by insurance carriers, something the
company hopes to achieve as it continues to collect ongoing
post-approval studies and opinions by third-party advocates, such
as the National Kidney Foundation.
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/fn/4816583.html
Hazards of the EXTERNAL
VeriChip with lithium batteries
Lithium batteries on
EXTERNAL Verichip only ( no Battery in INTERNAL Verichip )
First in response to the lithium battery comment - no RFID
doesn't use rechageable lithium batteries. RFID gets its energy
from the radio field which is used to read it.
Lithium ions
Quote: ""We
believe we have solved the battery issue, which leaves the
question of an antenna that can transmit through skin
tissue," said Applied Digital's chief scientist, Keith
Bolton. The devices will be powered by lithium ion batteries,
which can be charged remotely from outside the body"
Lithium is also an extremely poisonous metal,
and if it comes in contact with the human body at all, terrible sores erupt in the flesh.
http://www.evenmore.co.uk/prophecy/markofthebeast.html
http://www.emergingworlds.com/mc_article.cfm?link=Chip_implants_in_humans_begin_today.htm
"Lithium is employed
as a miniature power-plant for the chip since it self-energises
through changes in the host's body temperature. Thus the site for
the implant will usually be those body parts demonstrating the
greatest variations in temperature - in the back of the hand or
front of the head. Lithium does have one drawback, experts say.
It produces an infection when brought into contact with exposed
organic tissue. "http://www.campaignfortruth.com/Eclub/231104/CTM%20-%20history%20of%20implantible%20ic.htm
Lithium battery
http://sex.ncu.edu.tw/members/Ho/study/2002fall_oraltraining/st2002f_humans.htm
PRIVACY and TOTAL
CONTROL HAZARD
Over-all Wi-Fi Grid
Passive RFID chips do indeed have a short range, requiring
activation by a nearby scanner. However, corporations and the
United States government have been in favor of creating a
gargantuan network of such scanners for some years now.
Corporations (marketing reps, in particular) love the idea
because it would allow them to track their RFID-tagged products
while in stores and after the point of sale; the government
approves because once a consumer is covered in RFIDs (driver's
license, passport, articles like shoes or tires which don't
change wearers/cars often), he's that much easier to track -
should there ever be a need, of course. On the subject of
passports and licenses, I have to think it would suck for someone
with a hand-held, possibly homemade passive RFID scanner to get a
leg up in stealing my identity at the airport just because I
happened to have my passport in my pocket that day
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070213/061130.shtml
A Better Alternative :
EMAR
However, Gulf Coast uses a similar technology on
patients when they arrive — a wristband with a code that can
be scanned. The program is known as EMAR, or Electronic Medical
Administration Record. Once scanned, the code reveals who the
patient is, what medication he or she is on and other important
information, Whiting said. Doctors can keep up with changes in
their patient’s status remotely and can call in new
medicines or check on other needs, Whiting said.
Gulf Coast also gives small cards to patients for them to list
their prescriptions and allergies.
“It’s a handy little tool that is easy to use,”
Whiting said. “It’s inexpensive
http://www.newsherald.com/headlines/article.display.php?a=1771
Salvation www.cybertime.net/~ajgood/sal.htm
Bible www.blueletterbible.org